Blog 25: Chapter 6: Torey's Lyrics

In chapter six, Torey shares some of the lyrics from his band on pages 66-68. Choose two of these lyrics and explain what their significance is for Torey's life. Then, finish the song that Torey started--use any details about Torey's characterization or life in South Jersey to help you. Attempt to develop ten-fifteen lines for the song, and be sure to include a title. The song can be serious, silly, a rap, etc., as long as the lyrics are school appropriate and demonstrate aspects of Torey's characterization.

Be prepared to share the band's new jam!!

Where there ain't nothing to do but fool around

We joke around about what goes on

Is he alive, or is he dead?

Did he kill or did someone else kill?

Creed, Creed we hated him here

But now he's gone

We miss him, dear.

There is just something in my mind

I can't get it out.

Did I cause this?

"Where there ain't nothing to do but fool around," signifies that since there is nothing to do in the area, it gives them more of a reason to just sit around and theorize what happened to Chris Creed.

"Is he alive, or is he dead?" is very significant coming from Torey. This signifies that Torey has been thinking about Chris Creed so much that he has incorporated him into one of his songs.

Blog 24: Chapter 1 in The Body of Christopher Creed

According to some advice he received, what is Torey writing? Who gave him this advice? What is Torey's relationship to this person? In what way is this another connection to The Catcher in the Rye? Be specific in your response, and pull a quotation from the text.

Torey is writing an email to Alex Healy. He is writing after recieving advice from Dr. Fahdi. Dr. Fahdi is a teacher, and sort of a mentor to Torey. This book is a lot like The Catcher in the Rye. At the beginning of "The Catcher in the Rye," Holden's teacher/ mentor, Mr. Spencer offers up advice like Dr. Fahdi at the beginning of the novel. Also, Torey is writing things down, like Holden Caulfield, which we did not find out until the end.

Blog 23: Issues in our American Society

Choose TWO of the four New York Times: Upfront magazine articles to read: "Should I take a job promoting cigarettes?", "Driven to Distraction", "Is your lunch causing Global Warming?', or "Locked away forever?" All of the articles introduce controversial subjects highly debated in our current American society and provide data to support the argument being made.

After reading two of the articles, write a one-paragraph response to each. Consider the following questions for each editorial [your commentary need not be in this order]:

-How does the author of the news article support a specific position on the issue? Provide an example of this slanted perspective.

-What is your personal opinion on the subject under debate? Why do you support/ refute the article's points? [ex. Cigarettes- Why would you take the job/ not take the job?; Locked away- How old do you think an individual needs to be to tell right from wrong?; Global warming- What does your diet mostly consist of?; Distraction- Who do you know that texts while driving?]

-What statistics/ collected data/ pictures/ etc. does the author choose to make his/ her point(s) in the editorial? How are they effective?

In "Driven to Distraction, the author supports his main point of don't text while driving. He uses specific examples of how driving while texting could kill, and its new stricter laws. He keeps bringing up Utah as the strictest penalty because he is from Utah, but he is not using specific examples of how other states aren't as tough with their laws. As a new driver I believe texting while driving is terrible, and thinking that it is another thing that impairs the judgement of the driver is terrifying. I agree with the strict penalties he points out, like going away for texting while driving as long as drunk driving. The author uses the years of jail time and the amount of how heavy the fine is. He also cites specific examples of people being killed by texting while driving.

In "Locked Away Forever?" the author does not really take a position, he cites different people in jail and what age they committed their crime. I believe the criminal should go away for life, especially if they have committed multiple infractions. The author gives specific examples of the ages and what percent of the criminals who were under the legal age committed the crime.

[Posted: 3.12.10, end of the period; two paragraphs; 10 points]

*If you are absent, see me to get the articles and make up this blog.

Blog 22: The "Birds" and the Bees

Neither Momma nor Vivian ever discussed the facts of life with Ms. Angelou, leaving her with questions she is afraid to ask. The result of this is that Ms. Angelou conducts her own research and draws her own faulty conclusions. This is a dangerous thing to do, as Ms. Angelou becomes confused and disillusioned about intimacy, and ends up pregnant.

There are a lot of "what if" questions that can be drawn from this chapter. With a partner or by yourself, consider the following questions, and write your own opinions about them. CHOOSE AT LEAST FIVE QUESTIONS TO ANSWER. As a class, we will then review these questions and discuss the answers.

-Would Ms. Angelou have experimented with sex on her own if she hadn't been raped as a child?

Yes, she would have experimented with sex if she hadn't been raped as a child. Bailey experimented and Marguerite followed/ looked up to Bailey. She would have seen Bailey do it, then she would do it.

-What is the likelihood of Ms. Angelou becoming pregnant if Momma or Vivian had discussed the subject with her earlier?

There would have been a much lesser chance of Marguerite becoming pregnant if VIvian had discussed the subject earlier, because Marguerite would have not have been as confused about her sexuality, and would not have rushed into the relationship with her classmate. In chapter thirty-five, Marguerite tries to talk to Vivian about what is going on with her sexuality, and you could infer that Marguerite was unsure about the subject with the terminology she was using.

-What if Momma and Vivian both gave Ms. Angelou information about sex? How would their versions differ? How would each version affect Ms. Angelou? Whose advice would she absorb more readily?

Momma would talk about waiting until she was married because Momma is more proper. Vivian would talk about subject in a more practical fashion. She would probably make it sound appealing to Maya. Marguerite would probably listen more to Vivian because of the way she looked, Marguerite admired Vivian from the first day she met her. Marguerite would take in Momma's advice because she respected her, and Momma controlled her.

-What if Ms. Angelou was living in Stamps when she became pregnant? How would Momma have handled the pregnancy?

I believe it depends if Bailey were still with her in Stamps. Bailey took care of his sister. Marguerite would have been able to talk to Bailey about the subject of sex. Momma would have accepted the pregnancy. Momma was always looking towards the future, and Momma would see this as a blessing in disguise.

-What would happen to the baby's father if Ms. Angelou's uncles knew?

If the uncles found out about the baby's father and interpreted his actions as impregnating Marguerite then abandoning her, they would have set out to kill him.

Challenge: Can you develop one or two "what if" questions based on your reading of the story? Give it a try! [2 ex. credit points]

[10 POINTS, posted by the end of CLASS PERIOD, 3.09.10]